If you’ve tried general-purpose models and been underwhelmed by their performance, this article will walk you through a practical, step-by-step path to creating your own AI solution. The key lies in moving away from one-size-fits-all models and focusing on building small, specialized systems that do one thing—exceptionally well.

Section 1: The Limitations of Off-the-Shelf LLMs

Large language models are powerful, but they’re not a silver bullet. In many scenarios, particularly those that require real-time responses, fine-grained customization, or precise domain knowledge, general-purpose LLMs struggle. They can be:

• Incredibly slow, making real-time applications impractical.
• Insanely expensive, with API costs quickly ballooning as usage scales.
• Highly unpredictable, generating inconsistent or irrelevant results.
• Difficult to customize, offering limited control over the model’s internal workings or outputs.

For example, attempts to convert Figma designs into React code using GPT-3 or GPT-4 yielded disappointing outcomes—slow, inaccurate, and unreliable code generation. Even with GPT-4 Vision and image-based prompts, results were erratic and far from production-ready.

This inefficiency opens the door to a better alternative: building your own specialized model.

Section 2: Rethinking the Problem—From Giant Models to Micro-Solutions

The initial instinct for many developers is to solve complex problems with equally complex AI systems. One model, many inputs, and a magical output—that’s the dream. But in practice, trying to train a massive model to handle everything (like turning Figma designs into fully styled code) is fraught with challenges:

• High cost of training on large datasets
• Slow iteration cycles due to long training times
• Data scarcity for niche or domain-specific tasks
• Complexity of gathering labeled examples at massive scales

The smarter approach is to flip the script and remove AI from the equation altogether—at first. Break the problem into discrete, manageable pieces. See how far you can get with traditional code and reserve AI for the parts where it adds the most value.

This decomposition often reveals that large swaths of the workflow can be handled by simple scripts, business logic, or rule-based systems. Then, and only then, focus your AI efforts on solving the remaining bottlenecks.

Section 3: A Real-World Use Case—Detecting Images in Figma Designs

Let’s look at one practical example: identifying images within a Figma design to properly structure and generate corresponding code. Traditional LLMs failed to deliver meaningful results when interpreting raw Figma JSON or image screenshots.

Instead of building a monolithic model, the team broke the task into smaller goals and zeroed in on just detecting image regions in a Figma layout. This narrowed focus allowed them to train a simple, efficient object detection model—the same type of model used to locate cats in pictures, now repurposed to locate grouped image regions in design files.

Object detection models take an image as input and return bounding boxes around recognized objects. In this case, those objects are clusters of vectors in Figma that function as a single image. By identifying and compressing them into a single unit, the system can more accurately generate structured code.

Section 4: Gathering and Generating Quality Data

Every successful AI model relies on one thing: great data. The quality, accuracy, and volume of training data define the performance ceiling of any machine learning system.

So how do you get enough training data for a niche use case like detecting image regions in UI designs?

Rather than hiring developers to hand-label thousands of design files, the team took inspiration from OpenAI and others who used web-scale data. They built a custom crawler using a headless browser, which loaded real websites, ran JavaScript to find images, and extracted their bounding boxes.

This approach not only automated the collection of high-quality examples but also scaled rapidly. The data was:

• Public and freely available
• Programmatically gathered and labeled
• Manually verified for accuracy, using visual tools to correct errors

This attention to data integrity is essential. Even the smartest model will fail if trained on poor or inconsistent data. That’s why quality assurance—automated and manual—is as important as the training process itself.

Section 5: Using the Right Tools—Vertex AI and Beyond

Training your own model doesn’t mean reinventing the wheel. Thanks to modern platforms, many of the previously complex steps in ML development are now streamlined and accessible.

In this case, Google Vertex AI was the tool of choice. It offered:

• A visual, no-code interface for model training
• Built-in support for object detection tasks
• Dataset management and quality tools
• Easy deployment and inference options

Developers uploaded the labeled image data, selected the object detection model type, and let Vertex AI handle the rest—from training to evaluation. This low-friction process allowed them to focus on the problem, not the infrastructure.

Section 6: Benefits of a Specialized Model

Once trained, the custom model delivered outcomes that dramatically outpaced the generic LLMs in every critical dimension:

• Over 1,000x faster responses compared to GPT-4
• Dramatically lower costs due to lightweight inference
• Increased reliability with predictable, testable outputs
• Greater control over how and when AI is applied
• Tailored customization for specific UI design conventions

Instead of relying on probabilistic, generalist systems, this model became a deterministic, focused tool—optimized for one purpose and delivering outstanding results.

Section 7: When (and Why) You Should Build Your Own Model

If you’re considering whether to build your own AI model, here’s when it makes the most sense:

• Your task is narrow and repetitive, such as object classification, detection, or data transformation.
• Off-the-shelf models are underperforming in speed, accuracy, or cost.
• You need full control over your model’s behavior, architecture, and outputs.
• Your data is unique or proprietary, and not well-represented in public models.

That said, the journey begins with experimentation. Try existing APIs first. If they work, great—you can move fast. If they don’t, you’ll know exactly where to focus your AI training efforts.

The key takeaway is that AI isn’t monolithic. You don’t need a billion-dollar data center or a team of PhDs to train a model. In fact, a lean, focused, and clever implementation can yield results that beat the biggest names in the industry—for your specific needs.

Conclusion: The New Era of AI is Small, Smart, and Specialized

The myth that training your own AI model is difficult, expensive, and inaccessible is rapidly being debunked. As this case shows, with the right mindset, smart problem decomposition, and the right tools (like Vertex AI), even developers with modest machine learning experience can build powerful, reliable, and efficient AI systems.

By focusing on solving just the parts of your problem that truly require AI, and leaning on well-understood tools and cloud platforms, you can unlock enormous value—without the overhead of giant LLMs.

This is the future of AI: not just big and general, but small, nimble, and deeply purposeful.

The post Training your own AI model: How to build AI without the hassle appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

Despite their growing presence in our lives, there’s still widespread confusion about what LLMs really are and how they function. Are they simply “autocomplete on steroids,” or is there something more sophisticated at play? This article breaks down the complex inner workings of large language models into clear, digestible concepts—demystifying the layers, mechanisms, and logic that drive these powerful tools.

From Autocomplete to Intelligence: The Basic Premise of LLMs

At their core, LLMs are systems that predict the next word in a sequence, given all the words that came before. If you type “The Eiffel Tower is located in,” an LLM might suggest “Paris.” This seems straightforward—but when extended to billions of sentences and nuanced language usage, it becomes much more powerful.

By learning to predict the next word, LLMs inadvertently absorb the structure of language, facts about the world, reasoning patterns, and even stylistic nuances. This simple mechanism, scaled to unprecedented levels, is what enables them to write essays, answer legal questions, or mimic different writing styles.

The core task—predicting the next word—might sound like a trivial autocomplete function. But scale it up with immense amounts of data and sophisticated architecture, and you get behavior that looks remarkably like intelligence.

Tokens: The Building Blocks of Language Understanding

Before diving deeper, it’s important to understand how LLMs perceive language. They don’t operate directly on words or letters but on tokens. Tokens are chunks of text—ranging from single characters to entire words or subwords—depending on the model and its tokenizer.

For example, the word “unhappiness” might be broken into “un,” “happi,” and “ness.” This tokenization helps models manage vocabulary size while still representing complex linguistic structures. Each token is then transformed into a numerical vector through a process called embedding—essentially translating language into math.

This math-first approach allows the model to perform operations on the abstract representation of language, opening the door to nuanced understanding and generation.

Neural Networks: Layers of Abstraction

Once tokens are converted into vectors, they are passed into a neural network, specifically a type called a Transformer. This architecture was introduced in 2017 by Google researchers in a landmark paper titled “Attention is All You Need.”

Here’s how it works at a high level:

• Each layer in the Transformer processes token vectors, capturing increasingly abstract patterns.
• Initial layers may focus on syntax (e.g., sentence structure), while deeper layers grasp semantics (e.g., meaning) and context.
• These layers use mechanisms called attention heads to weigh the importance of different tokens relative to each other.

Imagine you’re processing the sentence “The trophy wouldn’t fit in the suitcase because it was too small.” The word “it” could refer to either the suitcase or the trophy. Attention mechanisms help the model decide which interpretation makes more sense in context.

Attention Mechanism: The Heart of the Transformer

The attention mechanism is what allows Transformers to outperform older models. Instead of reading a sentence word by word in a sequence, the attention system enables the model to look at all tokens simultaneously and decide which ones are most relevant when predicting the next word.

This is like how humans process language. When you read a sentence, you don’t just consider the last word—you often consider the entire sentence, or even the paragraph, to understand what comes next.

LLMs do this with scaled dot-product attention. In simple terms, for every token, the model calculates:

• Query: What am I looking for?
• Key: What information do I have?
• Value: What should I remember?

Each token’s query is compared with every other token’s key to compute attention weights, determining how much influence each other token should have in shaping the final output.

Training the Beast: Learning from Billions of Words

Large language models are trained using self-supervised learning on massive text corpora—often including everything from books and Wikipedia to social media posts and coding repositories. They aren’t taught using labeled data like “this is a dog, this is a cat.” Instead, they learn by trying to predict masked or missing tokens in real-world text.

This training process involves:

• Tokenizing billions of sentences into manageable chunks.
• Feeding them through the model, where it predicts the next token in the sequence.
• Comparing the prediction to the actual token using a loss function.
• Adjusting internal weights through a process called backpropagation to reduce the error.

Do this billions of times, and the model starts to pick up on deep patterns in language—how ideas are expressed, how arguments are structured, and what facts commonly co-occur.

Emergent Abilities: Intelligence from Scale

One of the most fascinating aspects of LLMs is that they exhibit emergent behaviors—abilities that weren’t explicitly programmed or anticipated but appear naturally once the model reaches a certain size and training depth.

Examples of emergent abilities include:

• Translation between languages without direct training.
• Arithmetic reasoning, like solving math problems.
• Code generation, even when the model wasn’t trained specifically on code.

These capabilities arise from the sheer scale of training and the universal patterns present in human communication. The model doesn’t “understand” in a conscious way, but it becomes remarkably good at mimicking understanding by statistically modeling vast data.

Limitations and Misconceptions

Despite their capabilities, LLMs are not infallible. They can generate hallucinations—plausible-sounding but incorrect or made-up information. This happens because the model doesn’t “know” facts; it generates outputs based on patterns in training data.

Moreover:

• They lack memory and awareness. LLMs don’t have a persistent sense of identity or memory across conversations unless specifically engineered to simulate it.
• They are sensitive to input phrasing. Slight changes in wording can lead to drastically different responses.
• They don’t reason like humans. Their “reasoning” is the byproduct of pattern recognition, not logical deduction or critical thinking.

Understanding these limitations is critical for using LLMs responsibly and setting realistic expectations.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)

To make models more useful and less prone to generating harmful or irrelevant content, a technique called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is often used.

Here’s how it works:

• After pretraining, the model is fine-tuned using example prompts and human preferences.
• Humans rank different responses, which helps train a reward model.
• This reward model is then used to further train the language model through reinforcement learning.

RLHF helps align the model’s behavior with human values and expectations—improving tone, helpfulness, and appropriateness.

Conclusion: A New Paradigm of Human-Machine Interaction

Large language models represent a seismic shift in how machines process language, knowledge, and logic. They’re not merely tools—they’re platforms for human expression, exploration, and collaboration. While they don’t possess consciousness, sentience, or intent, they simulate language-based intelligence in a way that’s proving transformative across industries.

Understanding how they work—tokens, transformers, attention mechanisms, training processes, and their limits—helps demystify the “magic” and puts the power back in human hands.

As we move forward, the challenge is not just to build bigger models, but to make them safer, more efficient, and better aligned with our goals as a society. In doing so, we unlock not just better machines—but new dimensions of human potential.

The post How large language models actually work: Unpacking the intelligence behind AI appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

Nvidia, a California-based company, soared to prominence not by creating consumer-facing products like Windows or iPhones but by developing AI chips that power the brains of computers. This reflects the rapid growth of the AI industry, with corporations worldwide integrating AI into their products. Google, a frontrunner in AI innovation, recently unveiled Gemini, an AI model integrated into its web products like Gmail and Google Search, with implications for millions of users globally.

The Troubling Debut

Despite Google’s hype surrounding Gemini’s launch, its debut quickly turned disastrous. Users discovered a glaring flaw: Gemini’s inability to recognize white people. Requests for images of historical figures like popes or Vikings yielded absurd results, with Gemini consistently depicting non-white individuals, even in historically inaccurate contexts. This prompted concerns about the underlying biases programmed into Gemini and its implications for representation in AI.

Jen Gai, head of Google’s Global Responsible AI Operations and Governance team, claims to uphold ethical standards in AI development. However, a deeper dive into Gai’s views reveals a troubling ideology. Gai advocates for treating demographic groups differently based on historical systems and structures, contradicting the principles of fairness and equality. Her approach raises questions about Google’s commitment to ethical AI and its potential impact on marginalized communities.

The Ideological Underpinnings

Google’s emphasis on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in AI development reflects a broader trend within the tech industry. However, this focus often leads to questionable practices, as seen in Gemini’s flawed algorithms. Gai’s assertion that recognizing allyship may come across as “othering” highlights the convoluted logic driving Google’s AI ethics. By prioritizing ideological agendas over objective accuracy, Google risks undermining the integrity of its AI models and perpetuating bias.

Beyond the technical flaws of Gemini lies a more significant concern: the potential societal impact of biased AI. Google’s dominance in online platforms means that Gemini’s biases could shape user experiences, influence perceptions, and perpetuate stereotypes on a massive scale. Moreover, Google’s history of political biases raises fears of AI manipulation for ideological agendas, posing a threat to democratic processes and public discourse.

Conclusion:

Google’s Gemini AI model, heralded as a game-changer in the field of artificial intelligence, has instead unveiled a series of dark secrets and ethical lapses. From its flawed algorithms to the ideological biases of its creators, Gemini raises profound questions about the role of AI in shaping our digital future. As society grapples with the implications of biased AI, it becomes imperative for tech companies like Google to prioritize ethical standards and accountability in AI development.

Key Takeaways:

• Gemini, Google’s latest AI model, has sparked controversy due to its flawed algorithms that fail to recognize white people accurately.
• Jen Gai, head of Google’s AI ethics team, advocates for treating demographic groups differently based on historical structures, raising concerns about biased AI development.
• Google’s emphasis on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in AI development reflects broader industry trends but risks prioritizing ideological agendas over objective accuracy.
• The societal implications of biased AI, as seen in Gemini, include shaping user experiences, influencing perceptions, and perpetuating stereotypes on a massive scale.
• Google’s history of political biases raises fears of AI manipulation for ideological agendas, posing a threat to democratic processes and public discourse.

The post Unveiling the dark secrets behind Google’s new AI model, ‘Gemini’ appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

The main objectives of traditional cybersecurity attacks are system disruption and data extraction. Attacks on AI systems frequently aim to steal data or cause disruptions, but they are designed more subtly and with a longer-term perspective.

They attempt to take over the targeted system for a specific purpose or trick the model into disclosing its inner workings through system intrusion before altering its behavior. This goal can be achieved through mainly, but not exclusively, four types of attacks: data poisoning, tempering of categorization models, backdoors, and reverse engineering of the AI model.

1. Data poisoning

Data poisoning occurs when attackers intentionally introduce false data into a legitimate dataset to train the system to behave differently. It has been demonstrated that an attacker could produce a 75.06% change in the dosage of half of the patients using the AI system for their treatment by adding 8% of inaccurate data.

2. Tampering with categorization models

Attackers could change the results of AI system applications by changing the categorization models of, for example, neural networks. For instance, using images of 3D-printed turtles acquired using a particular algorithm, researchers could trick an AI system’s learning process into classifying turtles as rifles.

3. Backdoors

AI systems can also be hacked by adversaries using backdoor injection attacks. Such attacks are carried out by the adversary using a specially made perturbation mask applied to particular images to override the correct classifications. The learned deep neural network maintains its normal functionality by using data poisoning from the training set with a low poisoning fraction to inject the backdoor into the victim model. Therefore, once launched, such attacks have the potential to cause significant havoc in a variety of realistic applications, such as sabotaging an autonomous vehicle or passing for someone else to gain unauthorized access.

4. Reverse engineering the AI model

By accessing the AI model through reverse engineering, attackers can launch more focused and effective adversarial attacks. For instance, if the training phase is reliable, an adversary can target the ML inference and discover the secret model parameters using the Differential Power Analysis methodology, according to a study by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). As a result, the adversary may create copies of the system, endangering security and intellectual property.

Attacks on ML systems can have serious repercussions when incorporated into crucial applications. AI attacks can potentially increase existing threats, introduce new ones, and change how threats typically behave. AI attacks can also take the shape of attacks that target various algorithmic flaws or various environmental inputs.

The post Four types of cyber attacks against AI models and applications appeared first on RoboticsBiz.