With a projected market size of $34 billion by 2026, RaaS is more than a passing trend—it’s the cornerstone of a new industrial paradigm.

What Is RaaS and Why It Matters

RaaS reimagines how businesses approach automation. Instead of purchasing expensive robotic systems outright, companies “rent” robots to perform specific tasks. These subscriptions often include everything from hardware and software to maintenance, support, and real-time analytics. The key value? Companies aren’t buying robots—they’re buying outcomes. Whether it’s welding parts, moving boxes, or delivering hospital supplies, RaaS shifts the focus from owning machines to achieving operational goals.

This model is particularly compelling for small and medium-sized businesses that historically lacked the capital or expertise to implement automation. RaaS democratizes access to robotics, making advanced technology available to a broader market without the burden of massive upfront investment.

Where RaaS Is Already Making Waves

1. Manufacturing and Warehousing

The earliest adopters of RaaS include manufacturers and warehouse operators. Robots here are already handling repetitive and physically taxing tasks such as:

• Palletizing: Robots stack and organize products on pallets at the end of assembly lines.
• Machine Tending: Automated systems load and unload CNC machines, presses, and welders.
• Inspection and Quality Control: Equipped with vision systems, robots can inspect components ten times faster than manual checks.

One RaaS leader, Formic, has deployed robots for clients who had struggled to implement automation for over a decade. The company handles everything—from site scanning and system design to maintenance—allowing customers to double or triple their factory output without adding labor.

2. Retail and Logistics

From automated shelf scanners to customer engagement bots, retail stores are testing RaaS to enhance customer experience and inventory accuracy. SoftBank’s Pepper robot, for instance, interacts conversationally with shoppers, while autonomous shelf-monitoring robots help reduce stockouts.

In logistics, companies like Geek+ have rolled out fleets of robots for e-commerce giants, offering cloud-coordinated solutions that manage everything from package sorting to warehouse transport. Starship Technologies’ sidewalk robots are another notable case—delivering food and groceries autonomously across campuses and neighborhoods.

3. Agriculture

With seasonal labor becoming increasingly hard to find, agriculture is emerging as a hotbed for RaaS innovation. Blue White Robotics, for example, retrofits conventional tractors with autonomous kits and offers them as a subscription service. Their AI-enabled robots handle everything from seeding and spraying to harvesting. Farmers benefit from increased efficiency while avoiding the high costs of new autonomous tractors—saving up to $90,000 annually in operational costs.

4. Healthcare and Hospitality

Hospitals and hotels are turning to RaaS to streamline operations and enhance service. Diligent Robotics’ Moxi assists nurses by fetching supplies, transporting samples, and reducing low-value manual labor. In hospitality, robots now deliver towels, food, and other amenities directly to guest rooms, often without human interaction—especially relevant in a post-pandemic world where contactless service is preferred.

5. Field Services and Utilities

Robots are also performing dangerous inspections of power lines, pipelines, and solar panels. Drones and crawling bots, deployed via subscription, provide cost-effective ways to maintain remote infrastructure, reducing human exposure to hazardous environments.

Key Benefits of RaaS

1. Lower Upfront Costs

One of the biggest barriers to automation—capital expense—is eliminated. RaaS transforms automation into a manageable operational expenditure, making it accessible even to businesses with limited budgets.

2. Scalability and Flexibility

Businesses can scale robot usage up or down depending on demand. No need to overinvest in hardware that may become obsolete or underutilized.

3. Cutting-Edge Technology

Service providers handle software updates, repairs, and equipment upgrades. Clients get access to the latest innovations without navigating the technical complexities.

4. Faster ROI

RaaS providers are outcome-focused. By aligning success with client performance metrics, they drive real efficiency gains—often enabling higher factory throughput and improved profit margins.

5. Operational Focus

Businesses can concentrate on their core competencies while providers manage the complexity of robotics implementation and upkeep.

Challenges and Limitations

Despite its promise, RaaS adoption isn’t without obstacles:

• Integration Complexity: Integrating robotic systems into existing workflows and IT environments remains a challenge, especially for non-digitized businesses.
• Uncertain ROI: The return on investment isn’t always clear-cut, especially in industries lacking detailed automation cost benchmarks.
• Job Loss Fears: Concerns about automation displacing human workers still loom large. Effective communication and retraining strategies are essential.
• Safety and Security: Widespread deployment in healthcare or public spaces raises questions about liability, cybersecurity, and reliability.
• Technology Limitations: Not all tasks are easily automatable today. Hardware constraints—such as the high cost and limited dexterity of robotic arms—still impede some use cases.

Collaborative vs. Industrial Robots

Collaborative robots (cobots) are designed to work alongside humans without safety barriers, making them ideal for small-batch manufacturing or space-constrained environments. However, their payload and speed limitations mean that traditional industrial robots still dominate in high-throughput settings.

The future likely lies in hybrid models. Companies like Veo Robotics are developing camera-based systems that enable industrial robots to operate safely near humans. As AI, computer vision, and sensor technologies improve, the line between collaborative and industrial robots will continue to blur—making all robots inherently more adaptable and cooperative.

AI, Machine Learning, and the Road to Intelligent Automation

While RaaS today is more about logistics and execution, AI’s role is growing. In the near future, robots will be able to:

• Interpret natural language commands.
• Adjust behavior based on visual or contextual feedback.
• Learn new tasks autonomously, reducing the need for reprogramming.

Companies like Formic already use 3D scanning and LiDAR to map client facilities and simulate robot workflows before deployment—saving weeks of setup time. These tools are laying the groundwork for AI-driven robots that can self-configure and adapt dynamically.

RaaS and the Future of Work

One of the most persistent myths about automation is that it eliminates jobs. But in practice, companies that adopt RaaS often expand their workforce—not reduce it. By automating undesirable, hard-to-fill roles, they unlock capacity and boost productivity. Factories running one shift are now running two or three, requiring more salespeople, drivers, supervisors, and marketing professionals.

More broadly, automation turns non-market activities—like driving or dishwashing—into paid services. Autonomous delivery and kitchen robots, for example, monetize tasks that were once unpaid labor. In this way, RaaS doesn’t just replace work—it redefines economic participation.

The Next Five Years: What Lies Ahead

The future of RaaS is likely to be shaped by:

• AI-Driven Programming: Natural language interfaces and generative AI will simplify robot setup and training.
• Hyper-Specialized Bots: A surge in robot vendors will lead to machines tailored for highly specific tasks and industries.
• Democratized Automation: Continued hardware cost declines and plug-and-play platforms will empower even micro-businesses to automate.
• Marketplace Models: Just as cloud platforms offer app marketplaces, we may soon see RaaS marketplaces where businesses can “shop” for task-specific robots.
• Environmental Intelligence: Robots will become more aware of surroundings, other robots, and human collaborators—enabling swarm intelligence and synchronized operations.

Conclusion

Robotics-as-a-Service is a radical shift in how businesses think about automation. By shifting the focus from ownership to outcomes, RaaS is unlocking innovation, lowering barriers, and reshaping industries at their core. While the road ahead includes challenges in technology, integration, and public perception, the momentum is undeniable.

Whether you’re running a bakery, a logistics firm, or a hospital, the robots are no longer coming—they’re already here. And they’re available… as a monthly subscription.

The post Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS): How subscription-based automation is redefining industry appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

In this article, we’ll dive deep into the best sales analytics tools for Amazon sellers. Whether you’re a seasoned seller or just starting, this guide will help you navigate the options, understand their features, and choose the right tool for your business. Let’s get started!

Why Sales Analytics Tools Are a Game-Changer for Amazon Sellers

Before exploring the tools themselves, it’s essential to understand why sales analytics tools are critical for Amazon sellers.

• Profitability Tracking: Amazon’s marketplace is highly competitive, and profit margins can be razor-thin. Sales analytics tools help you track your profit and loss (P&L) in real time, ensuring you’re not losing money on every sale.
• Inventory Management: Overstocking or understocking can be costly. These tools provide insights into your inventory levels, helping you avoid stockouts or excess inventory.
• Customer Insights: Understanding customer behavior—such as returns, refunds, and reviews—can help you improve your product offerings and customer satisfaction.
• Competitive Edge: By analyzing market trends and competitor performance, you can identify opportunities to outshine your competition.

With these benefits in mind, let’s explore the top sales analytics tools available for Amazon sellers.

1. Helium 10

Helium 10 is one of the most popular tools among Amazon sellers, and for good reason. It’s a comprehensive suite of tools designed to help sellers with everything from product research to keyword optimization and sales analytics.

Key Features

• Profit and Loss Tracking: Helium 10’s analytics dashboard provides a clear view of your revenue, expenses, and net profit.
• Inventory Management: The tool alerts you when your inventory runs low, helping you avoid stockouts.
• Refund and Return Insights: Track refunds and returns to identify problematic products or customer pain points.
• Custom Alerts: Set up alerts for critical business metrics, such as sudden sales drops or changes in competitor pricing.

Pros:

• Comprehensive Tool Suite: This suite offers over 30 tools, including product research, keyword research, listing optimization, and inventory management.
• User-Friendly Design: Intuitive interface with easy-to-follow training resources.
  Free Version Available: Allows users to test the platform before committing.

Cons:

• Overwhelming for Beginners: The extensive feature set can be daunting for new users.
• Customer Support: Some users report slow response times.

Why It Stands Out

Helium 10 is more than just a sales analytics tool—it’s a complete Amazon business management platform. Its robust features make it a favorite among sellers who want an all-in-one solution.

2. Putler

Putler is a comprehensive multi-channel analytics tool that consolidates data from multiple Amazon stores and 17+ other platforms into a single intelligent dashboard. Built for sellers managing complex operations, Putler goes beyond basic reporting to deliver advanced customer intelligence.

Key Features

• Advanced RFM Customer Segmentation: Automatically segments customers into 11 behavioral groups (Champions, Loyal, At-Risk, etc.) with one-click access to customer lists in each category.
• Sales Heatmap: Shows exactly when your customers are most active on your store, helping you time promotions and campaigns for maximum impact.
• Unlimited Filters & Segmentation: Create custom segments using multiple parameters and infinite filtering options to discover hidden opportunities.
• Holiday Season Insights: Detailed analysis of performance during peak periods like Black Friday and Christmas to optimize seasonal strategies.
• 200+ KPIs: Comprehensive metrics including LTV, Churn, MRR, ARR, ARPU across 8 dedicated dashboards.

Pros:

• Multi-Store Consolidation: Handles multiple stores, currencies, and data sources with automatic deduplication and cleaning.
• Advanced Customer Intelligence: Provides deep customer insights, including purchase behavior, lifetime value, and churn, etc.
• Operational Efficiency: Streamlines tasks like refunds (from 5 minutes to 5 seconds) and subscription management.
• Team Collaboration: Share insights with team members with proper access controls.

Cons:

• Limited Inventory Management: Focuses more on analytics and customer insights rather than inventory tracking features.

Why It Stands Out

Putler provides advanced analytics that not only analyzes Amazon but also payment gateways like PayPal and Stripe. You can integrate everything in one place – no need for different tools. Despite its powerful features, it remains user-friendly with intuitive dashboards that make complex data easy to understand. It’s the perfect all-in-one solution for sellers who want comprehensive business intelligence without the complexity.

3. Jungle Scout

Jungle Scout is another heavyweight in the Amazon seller community. Known for its product research capabilities, Jungle Scout also offers powerful sales analytics features.

Key Features

• Sales Dashboard: Monitor your sales performance, including revenue, units sold, and profit margins.
• Refund and Return Tracking: Identify trends in customer returns and refunds to improve product quality.
• Inventory Alerts: Receive notifications when your inventory levels are low or when it’s time to reorder.
• Tutorials and Support: Jungle Scout provides extensive tutorials and customer support to help you make the most of the tool.

Pros:

• Accurate Product Research: Known for precise data in product research and sales estimates.
• User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies the process for beginners.
• Supplier Database: Helps in finding reliable suppliers.

Cons:

• Limited Features Compared to Competitors: Offers fewer tools than Helium 10.
• Higher Pricing: Some users find it relatively expensive.

Why It Stands Out

Jungle Scout’s user-friendly interface and focus on education make it an excellent choice for beginners. Its sales analytics features are straightforward yet powerful, making it easy to track your business performance.

4. Sellerboard

If your primary focus is profitability, Sellerboard is your tool. Designed specifically for profit analytics, Sellerboard helps you understand your actual profit margins after accounting for all expenses.

Key Features

• Profit and Loss Reporting: Sellerboard provides detailed P&L reports, including Amazon fees, advertising, and shipping expenses.
• Inventory Insights: Track your inventory turnover rate and identify slow-moving products.
• Customizable Dashboards: Tailor your dashboard to focus on the metrics that matter most to your business.
• Free Trial: Sellerboard offers an extended two-month free trial, making it easy to test the tool before committing.

Pros:

• Detailed Profit Analytics: Provides real-time profit calculations, including all expenses.
  Affordable Pricing: Starts at $19 per month.
• Inventory Management: Helps track stock levels and manage inventory efficiently.

Cons:

• Limited Features: Focuses primarily on profit analytics, lacking broader tools like product research.
• User Interface: Some users find the interface less intuitive.

Why It Stands Out

Sellerboard’s laser focus on profitability sets it apart from other tools. It’s ideal for sellers who want to dig deep into their financials and optimize their profit margins.

5. Sellerise

Sellerise is a relatively new player in the Amazon sales analytics space, but it’s already making waves. Created by eight-figure Amazon seller Dima Kubrak, Sellerise is designed to help sellers streamline their operations and maximize profits.

Key Features

• Sales Analytics: Track your sales performance, including revenue, profit, and expenses.
• Advertising Insights: Analyze your Amazon PPC campaigns to optimize your ad spend.
• Inventory Management: Monitor your inventory levels and receive alerts when it’s time to reorder.
• Free Trial and Discounts: Sellerise offers users a free trial and a recurring 10% discount.

Pros:

• Comprehensive Operations Management: Offers tools for inventory management, keyword tracking, and review monitoring.
• User-Friendly Mobile App: Allows for business management on the go.
• Affordable Pricing: Starter plans begin at $17.99 per month.

Cons:

• No Product Research Tools: Lacks features for finding new products to sell.
• Limited Integrations: Fewer integrations compared to competitors.

Why It Stands Out

Sellerise’s unique selling point is its creator’s firsthand experience as a successful Amazon seller. This tool is built with real-world insights, making it highly practical and effective.

6. ZonGuru

ZonGuru is another versatile tool that offers a range of features for Amazon sellers, including sales analytics.

Key Features

• Sales Tracking: Monitor your sales performance and identify trends over time.
• Keyword Research: ZonGuru’s keyword research tools help optimize your product listings for better visibility.
• Inventory Alerts: Stay on top of your inventory levels with timely alerts.
• Free Trial and Discounts: ZonGuru offers a free trial and special discounts for new users.

Pros:

• All-in-One Platform: Provides tools for product research, keyword tracking, and listing optimization.
• User-Friendly Interface: Designed to be intuitive and easy to navigate.
• Affordable Pricing: Plans start at $49 per month.

Cons:

• Overwhelming for Beginners: Many tools can be daunting for new users.
• Short Free Trial: Offers only a 7-day free trial, which may not be sufficient for thorough testing.

Why It Stands Out

ZonGuru’s niche-focused approach makes it an excellent choice for sellers who want to combine sales analytics with other essential features like keyword research and listing optimization.

How to Choose the Right Tool for Your Business

Choosing the right sales analytics tool can feel overwhelming with so many options available. Here are some tips to help you make the best decision:

• Identify Your Needs: Are you primarily focused on profitability, inventory management, or customer insights? Different tools excel in other areas.
• Consider Your Budget: While most tools offer free trials, their pricing plans vary. Make sure to choose a tool that fits your budget.
• Test Multiple Tools: Use free trials to test different tools and see which works best for your business.
• Check for Integrations: If you’re already using other tools (e.g., for advertising or product research), ensure your chosen analytics tool integrates seamlessly.

Final Thoughts

In the competitive world of Amazon selling, knowledge is power. Sales analytics tools provide the insights you need to make informed decisions, optimize your operations, and stay ahead of the competition. Whether you choose Helium 10, Jungle Scout, Sellerboard, Sellerise, or ZonGuru, each tool offers unique features to help you succeed.

Remember, the best tool for you depends on your specific needs and goals. Take the time to explore your options, test different tools, and choose the one that aligns with your business strategy.

The post Top 5 best sales analytics tools for Amazon sellers appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

Enter haptic feedback. A breakthrough in medical simulation and robotics, haptic technology restores the sense of touch—transmitting sensations like pressure, resistance, and vibration to the surgeon. No longer confined to simulators and experimental labs, this innovation is now making its way into real-world surgical environments, dramatically improving training and operational outcomes.

Understanding Haptic Feedback

Haptic feedback refers to the use of tactile and force-based signals to replicate the experience of physical touch in virtual or remote environments. In surgical systems, this means providing the operator—often a surgeon—with the ability to feel how instruments interact with tissues, vessels, and bones.

There are two primary forms of haptic feedback:

• Kinesthetic feedback conveys information about the force, resistance, and motion of an object. It’s critical in tasks like cutting, pulling, or suturing.
• Tactile feedback simulates the texture, vibration, or subtle surface interactions, like feeling the grain of tissue or the pop of a ligament.

In surgical simulators and robotic systems, haptic feedback closes the loop in sensory-motor control. Instead of relying solely on visual monitoring, the surgeon can make decisions based on real-time tactile cues—leading to improved dexterity and accuracy.

Simulators Get Smarter: Training with Haptics

Surgical training is perhaps the most immediate beneficiary of haptic feedback. Simulators like the ProMIS system integrate advanced haptic mechanisms to recreate the feel of real surgery. These devices allow trainees to practice delicate tasks—such as laparoscopic suturing or tissue dissection—with realistic resistance and surface feel.

Key benefits of haptic simulators:

• Faster learning: Studies show up to 37% faster task completion.
• Greater accuracy: Up to 95% improvement in precision.
• Quantitative feedback: Performance metrics like force usage and completion time help fine-tune skills.

Traditional box trainers provide some tactile response, but they fall short of the nuanced simulation VR-based haptic systems can achieve. Yet, VR platforms still struggle to fully recreate the fidelity of real haptic sensations—posing challenges in skill transfer from simulator to surgical suite.

From Training Rooms to Operating Rooms

Historically, the surgical robotics field—led by companies like Intuitive Surgical—argued that visual feedback alone was sufficient. Expert surgeons adapted by learning to “see” tissue tension and force application without actually feeling it.

However, for younger or less experienced surgeons, the lack of tactile information adds a steep learning curve. Recognizing this, Intuitive recently introduced a version of the da Vinci system featuring integrated haptic feedback—a move that signals a paradigm shift in the industry.

The inclusion of haptics in real surgical systems is no longer a luxury—it’s rapidly becoming a minimum requirement, or as some suggest, “table stakes” for competitive surgical platforms.

Challenges of Bringing Haptics to Surgery

Why did it take so long for haptics to become mainstream in robotic surgery? The reasons are largely technical and practical:

• Sterilization: Surgical instruments must withstand harsh sterilization procedures, making it difficult to integrate sensitive haptic sensors.
• Miniaturization: Embedding feedback mechanisms into small, complex instruments without compromising their function is non-trivial.
• Real-time processing: Translating sensor input into meaningful tactile sensations with minimal delay requires robust computational infrastructure.

Despite these hurdles, the field has advanced dramatically, and we’re now seeing clinical-grade systems that balance durability with nuanced feedback.

Haptics in Thoracic and Minimally Invasive Surgeries

In procedures like video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted knot-tying, haptic feedback is particularly valuable. These surgeries involve minimal visual and tactile access, increasing the importance of every sensory input available.

Key improvements with haptics in these procedures include:

• Reduced applied force, lowering the risk of tissue damage.
• Improved knot security in suturing tasks.
• Shorter hospital stays due to fewer complications.

This level of control allows surgeons to operate more confidently, even in anatomically constrained or high-risk scenarios.

Beyond Force: Expanding the Haptic Horizon

Currently, most systems offer force-based (kinesthetic) feedback, but the next frontier lies in tactile richness—adding sensations like temperature, tissue compliance, and micro-texture. In the same way that surgical imaging has evolved to include hyperspectral and fluorescence modalities, haptic technologies are poised to expand what surgeons can feel.

Future possibilities include:

• Tissue stiffness differentiation, aiding in tumor localization.
• Thermal cues for identifying inflammation or infection.
• Moisture and surface texture recognition, enhancing realism.

Such sensory augmentation could elevate robotic surgery to superhuman levels of perception—not just replacing, but enhancing human touch.

Cognitive Load and Neural Efficiency: How Haptics Help the Brain

Studies reveal that haptic feedback doesn’t just improve performance—it makes it less mentally exhausting. Tasks completed with haptic-enabled prosthetics or simulators show:

• Higher task success rates.
• Lower cognitive effort, as measured by neuroimaging (e.g., fNIRS).
• Better “neural efficiency”—a concept that ties brain activity levels to performance quality.

This is particularly relevant for novice surgeons, who often face cognitive overload when multitasking complex surgical procedures with unfamiliar equipment.

Haptic Shared Control

Researchers are exploring hybrid control systems where both human input and robotic autonomy work together. Known as haptic shared control, this approach allows:

• Human-robot collaboration, where the robot assists in repetitive or sensitive tasks.
• Real-time adjustment based on haptic feedback and user preference.
• Faster task completion with higher precision.

Experiments show that users lifting brittle, weight-variable objects (simulating fragile tissues) perform significantly better under shared control with haptic feedback, even when the robot determines the grip force.

Bridging the Virtual-Real Gap in Surgical Training

One of the core challenges in medical education is skill transfer from VR to real surgery. Research shows that while training in physical environments translates well to virtual environments, the reverse isn’t always true.

This gap may stem from differences in haptic rendering and dynamic interaction in VR platforms, which can distort a trainee’s tactile expectations. Interestingly, applying brain stimulation (tDCS) during VR training has shown promise in improving the transfer of skills by enhancing cerebellar pre-planning capabilities.

Fundamental Research in Perception and Adaptation

Even when haptic signals are filtered through robotic interfaces, humans show a remarkable ability to adapt. Experiments with various teleoperator configurations reveal that users quickly learn the dynamics of new systems—compensating for mechanical stiffness or delay with minimal training.

This plasticity opens doors for designing more intuitive and responsive haptic interfaces, even in constrained settings like space missions, underwater operations, or combat zones.

The Mirror Effect: A Glimpse into Perceptual Haptics

In a more experimental vein, researchers explored a phenomenon where a visual cue through a mirror, when combined with minimal tactile input (like a finger tap), convinced users they were being stroked along the entire finger. This novel illusion demonstrates how vision can powerfully augment or override tactile perception, hinting at future applications in VR and AR-based surgical training.

Such illusions could pave the way for lower-cost, lower-complexity haptic systems that rely on perceptual tricks rather than expensive hardware.

Conclusion

Haptic feedback is no longer just a promising feature in the prototype phase—it is redefining what’s possible in robotic surgery, simulation, and prosthetics. By bridging the sensory gap between surgeon and patient, haptic technology enables more intuitive, effective, and safer procedures. From improving task accuracy and cognitive efficiency to enhancing trainee learning curves and pioneering perceptual illusions, haptics is quietly becoming the backbone of next-generation surgical systems.

As leading platforms adopt this innovation and research pushes boundaries further, the future of surgery won’t just be seen—it will be felt.

The post How haptic feedback is redefining precision and training in robotic surgery appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

Certifications provide a structured way for engineers to build skills that address cybersecurity risks specific to robotics. While most cybersecurity programs are built for general IT professionals, some certifications align closely with the systems, protocols, and challenges faced by robotics engineers.

This article outlines the top cybersecurity certifications suited for robotics professionals, what each program covers, and how it complements the robotics domain.

Why Robotics Engineers Need Cybersecurity Skills

Increasing Connectivity in Robotic Systems

Modern robots rely on a combination of embedded systems, IoT devices, wireless communication, and remote control protocols. These systems are exposed to external threats when connected to the internet or other networks. A single vulnerability in code, sensors, or wireless protocols can allow unauthorized access or manipulation of the system.

Robotics engineers often work with real-time systems, actuators, machine vision, and edge computing. These components are attractive targets for attackers seeking to disrupt manufacturing, steal intellectual property, or hijack medical or military robots. Cybersecurity knowledge enables engineers to design systems that are both functional and secure.

Growing Demand in Industry

Manufacturing, healthcare, and defense sectors are actively hiring robotics experts with cybersecurity backgrounds. As a result, engineers who can demonstrate skills in secure system design, vulnerability assessment, and protocol protection gain a competitive edge in the job market.

Certifications help bridge the gap between engineering and cybersecurity. They offer a clear, industry-accepted way to validate knowledge and ensure robotics engineers are capable of protecting the systems they build. To learn more about the certifications, check this page out.

Top Cybersecurity Certifications for Robotics Engineers

1. CompTIA Security+

Security+ is a foundational cybersecurity certification that offers broad exposure to core principles like access control, encryption, network security, and risk management. For robotics engineers, it builds the base needed to understand how systems interact securely across networks.

Security+ is especially useful for those new to cybersecurity. It doesn’t require a prior background in security and helps engineers think critically about how devices interact with external systems.

Relevance to Robotics

Security+ helps robotics engineers:

• Understand basic cryptography used in communication protocols.
• Learn about authentication methods for device access.
• Gain insight into threat modeling for connected systems.

Since robots often interact with sensors, controllers, and cloud dashboards, knowing how to secure these communication layers is a direct benefit of completing Security+.

Required Gear

To prepare, engineers will need:

• A laptop with at least 8 GB RAM and basic internet access.
• A virtual lab or simulation software to test security concepts.
• Access to CompTIA-approved learning material and practice exams.

2. GIAC Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional (GICSP)

GICSP is specifically designed for professionals working at the intersection of control systems and cybersecurity. It covers industrial control systems (ICS), SCADA systems, embedded devices, and real-time operations—core components in robotics used in industrial environments.

Offered by GIAC, GICSP is ideal for robotics engineers working in manufacturing, energy, or infrastructure sectors where system integrity and uptime are critical.

Relevance to Robotics

GICSP helps robotics engineers:

• Learn how to secure programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and embedded devices.
• Understand threat vectors in operational environments.
• Apply risk management frameworks to physical systems.

This certification is highly technical and well-suited for professionals involved in deploying robotic systems that interface with industrial hardware or automation protocols.

Required Gear

Preparation for GICSP includes:

• A system with 16 GB RAM to run industrial protocol emulators.
• Access to ICS simulation tools or virtual machines.
• Hands-on lab practice with Modbus, DNP3, or similar communication protocols.

3. Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP)

OSCP is a hands-on certification focused on offensive security and penetration testing. It’s considered one of the most challenging but respected credentials in the cybersecurity space. For robotics engineers, OSCP provides the skills to think like an attacker—an important mindset when building systems meant to withstand external threats.

The OSCP exam requires candidates to exploit vulnerabilities in real-world systems, escalate privileges, and document the findings. This active learning experience is ideal for robotics professionals who want to understand how attackers could target their devices, sensors, and protocols.

Relevance to Robotics

OSCP helps robotics engineers:

• Identify vulnerabilities in custom-built robotics platforms.
• Understand how attackers exploit communication protocols and firmware.
• Learn how to secure Linux-based robotic operating systems, such as ROS or ROS2.

With robots often relying on APIs, sockets, and remote inputs, OSCP-trained engineers gain the skills to audit their systems from an adversarial point of view.

Required Gear

Because OSCP involves practical lab work, a strong setup is needed:

• A laptop or desktop with at least 16–32 GB RAM and a modern multi-core processor.
• Virtualization tools like VirtualBox or VMware to run Kali Linux and target machines.
• Stable internet connection for accessing labs and exam platforms.
• Recommended use of a second monitor for managing multiple terminals and documentation during exam prep.

Engineers should also create a home lab to simulate robotic protocols and embedded devices, allowing targeted practice with tools like Burp Suite, Nmap, and Metasploit.

4. Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)

CISSP is designed for experienced professionals who want to move into leadership roles involving cybersecurity policy, architecture, and risk management. While CISSP is not a technical certification like OSCP, it offers a strong foundation for robotics engineers transitioning into management roles or working in regulated environments such as healthcare robotics or defense automation.

The certification is based on eight domains, including security engineering, software development security, communication security, and identity management. It focuses on designing secure systems from the ground up—a key requirement for robotics engineers building long-term infrastructure.

Relevance to Robotics

CISSP helps robotics engineers:

• Understand lifecycle security practices from design to decommissioning.
• Align robotics systems with compliance standards and safety protocols.
• Develop strategies for managing security policies across complex robotic deployments.

CISSP is particularly useful for senior engineers who oversee system design and integration across hardware, software, and network layers.

Required Gear

As CISSP is theory-intensive, the gear needed is minimal:

• A reliable laptop or tablet for reading, practice tests, and virtual courses.
• Study guides, flashcard apps, and scenario-based question banks.
• Optional practice exam tools to simulate multi-domain testing.

Engineers preparing for CISSP should allocate time to understand security frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST, especially when robotics systems are deployed in critical environments.

5. ROS-Specific Security Training

While not formal certifications, several training programs now offer security modules focused on the Robot Operating System (ROS). Since ROS and ROS2 are widely used in robotics research, prototyping, and commercial development, securing them is a growing priority.

ROS systems often have exposed ports, unsecured nodes, and limited access control, making them vulnerable to various threats. Engineers who understand the core architecture of ROS can benefit from focused security training that teaches how to apply encryption, authentication, and network segmentation techniques in robotic systems.

Relevance to Robotics

ROS-specific training helps engineers:

• Secure publisher-subscriber models and service calls.
• Configure secure ROS2 nodes using DDS Security plugins.
• Implement firewall and VPN solutions tailored for distributed robotic fleets.

Required Gear

To complete ROS-based security training:

• A development board or Linux-based system with ROS or ROS2 installed.
• Access to a simulation environment like Gazebo for testing configurations.
• Wireshark or similar tools for analyzing network traffic between nodes.

These programs are ideal for robotics engineers building autonomous vehicles, warehouse robots, or collaborative robotic arms where real-time security is critical.

Choosing the Right Certification Path

The best certification depends on the robotics engineer’s current role and career goals. Entry-level professionals working with networked robots or IoT systems may begin with Security+ or GICSP to build foundational understanding. Those interested in offensive security can move toward OSCP, while senior engineers focused on governance and system-level design should consider CISSP.

A hybrid path can also work well. For example, an engineer can start with Security+, progress to GICSP for industrial knowledge, and then specialize further with OSCP or ROS-based training. Certifications should not replace real-world practice but rather guide and validate learning at each stage of professional growth.

Final Thoughts

Cybersecurity is becoming a core requirement for robotics engineering. As robots become more connected and intelligent, they also become more vulnerable. Robotics engineers who understand how to protect their systems from cyber threats will stand out in a competitive industry.

Certifications offer a clear way to gain and prove this knowledge. From foundational programs to advanced offensive security training, there are paths available for engineers at every level. Investing in the right certifications not only improves technical ability but also strengthens career prospects in a security-conscious world.

The post Cybersecurity certifications tailored for robotics engineers appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

Merging animatronic craft with artificial intelligence and emotional design, Jennie promises the same companionship as a real pup—without the bathroom breaks or pet withdrawals. But does Jennie truly deliver meaningful comfort… and is $1,500 worth it? Let’s dig into the features, impact, and limitations of this lifelike robo‑dog.

The Origins of Jennie: A Story Close to the Heart

Jennie’s creation isn’t just engineering—it’s empathy engineered. Tombot CEO Tom Stevens was inspired when he had to rehome his mother’s beloved dog after her Alzheimer’s diagnosis. Beyond grief, this loss exacerbated her loneliness and depression. Determined to fill that void, Stevens founded Tombot in 2017 and set out to create a realistic, interactive robotic pet designed specifically for people with dementia.

Working alongside healthcare experts, families, and animatronics specialists, Tombot partnered with the world-famous Jim Henson’s Creature Shop to create Jennie’s physical design. The result is a product that feels more like a real dog than any other companion bot on the market.

Attention to Detail: What Makes Jennie So Real

Before marking Jennie as “just another toy,” it’s worth looking closely at the layers of thoughtful design that make her so lifelike and comforting.

Jennie’s realism is no accident. She was crafted with the same technology used to bring Hollywood creatures to life, thanks to the expertise of the Jim Henson Creature Shop. Her fur is soft and realistic, her facial expressions are dynamic, and her movements are nuanced. Unlike static plush toys, Jennie moves her head, tail, ears, and even her eyebrows—adding emotional expression to every interaction.

Jennie also features:

• Touch sensors embedded throughout her body that detect different types of interaction such as petting, tickling, or hugging.
• Voice recognition that allows her to learn and respond to her assigned name and simple commands.
• Dog-like sounds based on real recordings of golden retriever puppies to enhance realism and emotional connection.
• Customizable behaviors via an optional mobile app that lets caregivers adjust her responsiveness, sound levels, and emotional tone.
• Long battery life, capable of lasting an entire day on a single charge. She plugs in easily like a smartphone and is always ready for cuddles the next day.

Importantly, Jennie is a lap dog by design. She doesn’t walk or roam—reducing the risk of falls for seniors with mobility concerns. Her purpose is to sit, interact, and emotionally engage.

Therapeutic Intent: Clinical Support & Health Goals

Jennie isn’t just cute—she’s therapeutic. Tombot has designed Jennie from the ground up to support people with cognitive and emotional health challenges, especially those who may no longer be able to safely care for live animals.

Tombot is working with more than a dozen clinical partners, including hospitals and assisted living communities, to test Jennie’s effectiveness in real-world caregiving settings. Early studies and anecdotal feedback suggest that Jennie can reduce agitation, anxiety, and depression—especially in seniors with Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment.

But Jennie’s potential goes beyond dementia care. Families of children with autism, veterans with PTSD, and adults with depression or mobility limitations have also expressed interest. For individuals who can’t have a pet due to allergies, housing restrictions, or physical limitations, Jennie offers a safe, interactive alternative.

A key advantage over many other robot companions is Jennie’s combination of AI-driven unpredictability with gentle, pet-like responsiveness. She doesn’t just repeat programmed behaviors—she reacts in varied ways, making each interaction feel a little different. This variability fosters emotional engagement and curiosity, particularly in users with memory impairments.

User Experiences & Real-World Feedback

Jennie made a major impression at CES 2025, where attendees praised her realism and interactivity. For many, the appeal was instant: she looks, feels, and behaves like a real puppy without requiring food, walks, or bathroom breaks.

Healthcare workers and caregivers who tried Jennie noted how quickly people began talking to her, petting her, and treating her like a beloved animal. Her emotional presence can encourage touch, communication, and storytelling—important benefits for people experiencing cognitive decline or emotional isolation.

Families on the waitlist have described situations where Jennie could make a real difference: cancer patients unable to care for a dog during treatment, individuals with severe depression seeking comfort without the demands of real pet ownership, or children with autism who benefit from soothing tactile interaction.

Of course, not all feedback is perfect. Some users noted that Jennie’s high level of realism can feel a bit uncanny, especially when she stares for too long or makes unexpected sounds. But for the vast majority of test users, the realism is part of what makes her feel alive.

Price vs. Purpose: Is Jennie Worth $1,500?

Jennie is expected to retail between $1,000 and $1,500. That’s no small sum for a robotic companion—but it’s significantly less expensive than some competing therapy bots on the market.

To help you decide whether she’s worth the investment, here’s a quick comparison:

Compared to high-end therapy bots like Paro (used in hospitals and care homes), Jennie offers a much more affordable alternative without sacrificing much in terms of emotional engagement. Compared to more basic robotic pets like Joy For All’s plush dogs and cats, Jennie is in a different league altogether when it comes to interactivity and realism.

If Jennie helps reduce loneliness, anxiety, or the need for medications in a dementia patient—or offers daily comfort to a person with autism or PTSD—many families may find that she’s worth every penny.

Limitations and Room for Improvement

Jennie is an impressive product, but it’s important to be aware of her current limitations.

• She doesn’t walk or move around, which may disappoint users looking for a fully mobile robotic pet.
• She’s still in development, with new features and behaviors being added regularly—some functionality may not be available at launch.
• She may feel too realistic for some, especially users who find robotic movement or sounds unnerving.
• She’s relatively expensive, especially for families without insurance coverage or clinical support.
• App features are optional, but more advanced controls may require some tech comfort from caregivers.

Tombot has stated that software updates and new behaviors will be added over time, and a walking version may be released in the future. Still, Jennie’s design is firmly focused on safe, seated interaction for now.

Final Verdict: Who Should Consider Jennie?

Jennie is not a toy. She’s a sophisticated emotional support device designed for individuals who can’t care for live animals but still crave companionship, comfort, and routine.

Ideal for:

• Seniors with dementia or Alzheimer’s
• Individuals with autism, PTSD, or anxiety
• People with mobility issues or chronic illness
• Residents in pet-free care homes or hospitals

Not ideal for:

• Kids who want a walking, playful robot pet
• Users uncomfortable with hyper-realistic robotics
• Budget-conscious buyers seeking simple plush companions

Conclusion: A Worthy Companion for the Right Person

Tombot’s Jennie offers a compelling mix of realism, responsiveness, and emotional comfort. While she won’t replace a real dog, she fills a unique niche for those who need companionship but cannot safely or practically care for a living animal.

Her price reflects thoughtful engineering, strong clinical intentions, and a very specific therapeutic mission. If you or your loved one fits into the category of those who would benefit from emotional support—but who can’t accommodate the needs of a live pet—then Jennie could be a life-changing addition to your care plan.

In short, Jennie may not wag her tail at the door—but she can still warm a heart and calm a mind. For many, that’s more than worth the price.

The post Tombot Jennie Robotic Dog review (2025): Is it worth the $1,500 price tag? appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

Whether it is the selection of the raw materials or post-processing procedures, all the stages have been made resource-efficient. State-of-the-art CNC services are also gearing towards ISO 14001 and carbon-neutral certification routes. CNC metal machining is becoming a sustainable manufacturing practice with more intelligent controls, decreased fluid consumption, and lifecycle-based decision-making. This evolution reflects a larger industry shift—sustainability is becoming not just a compliance requirement, but a core strategy to gain a competitive edge.

Tool Life Management and Dry CNC Metal Machining

Cutting tool life extension is one of the most practical ways of minimizing material waste and operational downtime in CNC metal machining. Tool wear resistance is enhanced and breakage is minimized through optimized tool coating (TiAlN or DLC) and real-time adaptive feed control.

Tool condition monitoring (TCM) systems provide a multi-sensor input, e.g., vibration analysis, spindle power monitoring, and acoustic emissions, to identify tool deterioration before it affects part quality. Such systems assist in maintaining dimensional accuracy and reducing scrap rates as well as unplanned tool changes.

In combination with CNC services, sophisticated toolpath optimization algorithms can eliminate unnecessary passages, improve chip load balance and insert life, and in many cases, optimize tool usage by up to 30%.

Dry CNC metal machining takes sustainability a step further by eliminating conventional cutting fluids, which are expensive to manage and dispose of. Nevertheless, operation without coolants requires sophisticated thermal management. That is achieved through exploiting ultra-fine carbide tools, which have nano-structured coatings and can resist high interface temperatures. The geometry of chip evacuation is also a primary concern, and heat can be easily dissipated at high speeds.

In other configurations, dry machining is supported by minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) or compressed air cooling to keep tool performance high. By incorporating tool life analytics and thermal profiling into CNC services, manufacturers can provide predictive maintenance and consistent machining results.

Finally, the strategies are compatible with lean manufacturing objectives, as they facilitate zero-waste processing while tightening tolerance control in intricate geometries. Together, these innovations enable cleaner, smarter machining operations without compromising precision.

Coolant Recovery Systems and Low-Energy Spindle Cycles

Coolant waste is one of the most significant environmental concerns in CNC metal machining. Conventional flood cooling mechanisms result in heavy consumption rates and produce dangerous waste. Intelligent coolant recovery systems recover and filter used coolant to recirculate, decreasing the amount of disposal required and lowering related expenses. These systems use membrane filtration, centrifugal separation, and tramp oil removal to regenerate coolant with uniform pH and viscosity.

In automated CNC services, this provides coolant stability throughout long production runs with minimal environmental effects. The closed-loop coolant systems also reduce the operator’s exposure to volatile chemicals, contributing to a safer shop floor environment.

Low-energy spindle cycles also decrease the power consumption during idle or light-load tasks. CNC metal machining centers make the most of energy consumption at each cycle stage through variable frequency drives (VFDs) and regenerative braking systems. The energy used to slow the spindles can be recuperated and utilized again, decreasing the net energy use by 15-20 percent. These steps, combined with load-sensing hydraulic systems and intelligent part-loading routines, dramatically reduce the carbon footprint of CNC services.

Additionally, CNC software can schedule energy-intensive processes to off-peak times to balance the utility grid load and reduce operational expenses. These tactics provide sustainable machining without affecting cycle time or part quality.

LCA (Life Cycle Analysis) for Net-Zero Shop Floors

Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) tools measure and minimize the environmental impact of the CNC metal machining process at each phase, starting with raw material procurement and ending with end-of-life recycling. The LCA software can be connected to machine data and tracks inputs such as energy consumption per cut, tool wear rate, and material yield. This information is useful to support product-level Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), which are becoming common in automotive and aerospace contracts.

Contemporary CNC services utilize cloud LCA engines to benchmark sustainability KPIs against industry targets. For example, the carbon load of a precision-machined stainless bracket can be subdivided by the origin of alloys, machining time, history of spindle RPM, and coolant type. This motivates fact-based corrections in subsequent production batches.

The next-generation LCA software is connected directly to the machine monitoring systems to display live sustainability performance. This enables manufacturers to monitor real environmental performance on a job-by-job basis rather than using hypothetical models. These insights guide shop floors working toward net-zero emissions to optimize machining parameters, limit part rework, and remanufacture rather than dispose of parts.

Recording environmental information at every phase of the process enables CNC services to achieve ISO 14001 and other environmental regulatory requirements. When LCA becomes part of CNC metal machining, sustainability is no longer a reporting exercise but rather a real-time optimization activity. As stores move closer to circular production, LCA can help ensure that every choice is technically and ecologically grounded.

Conclusion

CNC services are being designed to produce high-precision products and be environmentally responsible. They incorporate sensor-controlled tool utilization, closed-loop coolant recovery, and energy-preserving spindle technology to make machining output and sustainability objectives compatible. These advancements permit CNC metalworking to achieve stringent dimensional tolerances and production requirements, reducing emissions, energy use, and material waste substantially. Using full-process lifecycle auditing and data-driven optimization, sustainable machining transforms an available upgrade into a standard of operation that enables traceable development toward net-zero manufacturing.

The post Sustainable metal machining: Reducing waste with smart CNC technology appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

At first, it’s manageable. Someone answers a few emails. Another person jumps on chat. You keep users happy. But then the user count grows. Issues start stacking up. And your small team begins to fall behind.

Why SaaS Companies Rely on External Teams

As things scale, support gets heavier. You need more hands. You need quicker replies. But hiring takes time. Training takes longer. And the core team already has a lot going on.

That’s why many companies decide to outsource SaaS customer service. It helps them get professional support agents fast. These people are trained to handle pressure. They know how to calm frustrated users. They keep conversations smooth.

This isn’t about replacing your voice. It’s about extending your reach. The user still gets a personal response. Your core team gets to focus on what they do best.

Scaling Without Breaking Anything

Growth is exciting. But it adds stress. Each new user means more questions. More logins. More feature requests. Internal teams can’t always keep up. They break under that pressure.

An external support team gives you flexibility. You can start small. Then scale up during launches. Or scale down during quiet months. There’s no need to rush hiring. You don’t need to worry about training cycles.

This model gives you breathing room. Your team won’t feel buried in tickets. Your users won’t wait three days for help.

Focus Brings Results

Your SaaS business depends on product updates. Speed matters. You want to release features fast. You want to fix bugs fast. That can’t happen if your developers are answering customer emails every morning.

External support clears that space. It keeps your product team in their lane. Designers can design. Engineers can code. Founders can think about growth.

With clear roles, things move faster. You stop reacting. You start improving the product. That’s how long-term growth happens.

Friendly and Human Support Still Works

Some people worry about losing that “personal touch.” They think outsourcing makes support cold. That’s only true if the partner is wrong. A good team learns your voice. They read your guidelines.

They respond with kindness. They take time to understand the issue. They don’t rush users off the chat. They actually help. And users can feel that.

This kind of service builds loyalty. It makes people talk. It turns first-time users into long-time fans.

Around-the-Clock Support Keeps You Ahead

Your SaaS product is online 24/7. So are your users. Someone is always logging in. Someone is always asking for help. Time zones don’t care about your office hours.

That’s where an external team becomes a game-changer. Many of them work in shifts. They offer 24/7 coverage. If a problem shows up at 3 AM, someone is already on it.

This creates peace of mind. Your users never feel abandoned. They get answers fast. And your team gets to sleep.

Data From Support Can Fuel Product Growth

Support teams hear everything. They catch every complaint. Every confusing screen. Every bug that shows up again and again. That’s not just noise. That’s useful feedback.

External support teams often track that feedback. They organize it. They send it back to your product team. Now, you don’t have to guess what’s broken. Or what’s missing. The data shows you.

You can turn complaints into upgrades. You can fix what really matters. That tight loop between support and product is pure gold.

Burnout Doesn’t Spread

Handling support can wear people out. You’re dealing with frustration all day. You’re solving the same issues again and again. It gets draining. Fast.

If your internal team handles all of that, burnout is around the corner. People get tired. Mistakes creep in. Morale drops.

With an outsourced team, that weight is shared. The pressure spreads out. The work stays balanced. Your internal team can breathe. They can reset. That makes a huge difference in team health.

External Support Teams Can Boost Your Brand

Support isn’t just about solving problems. It’s part of your brand. Every reply reflects your values. Every interaction shapes your reputation.

Outsourced agents can help you keep that standard high. They follow your scripts. They use your tone. They act like your team. And users notice that consistency.

That strong support experience becomes part of what you offer. People talk about it. They write reviews. They tell others. And that drives organic growth.

Final Thoughts

Support isn’t a back-office task. It’s not just about closing tickets. It’s a core part of your SaaS business. It shapes how users feel. It builds loyalty. It can even create opportunities for growth.

When you outsource SaaS customer service, you make space for your team. You give users better help. You collect real feedback. You improve faster. And you protect your company from burnout and chaos.

External support teams aren’t just a shortcut. They’re a smart strategy. They give your SaaS the backup it needs to grow strong and steady.

The post The role of external support teams in driving SaaS growth appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

This article delves into a diverse ecosystem of open-source robotics projects tailored for research. We’ll explore agile mobile robots, ethologically inspired manipulators, educational haptics, and autonomous aerial vehicles. Beyond simple descriptions, we’ll highlight common design themes, emerging trends, and the practical challenges and benefits of adopting open frameworks in research. Whether your focus is autonomous navigation, dexterous manipulation, or human–robot interaction, these open-source platforms provide powerful canvases to build upon.

ROS and the Ecosystem of Simulators

1. Robot Operating System (ROS)

At its core, ROS (Robot Operating System) is a flexible framework that orchestrates modular robotics components: sensor drivers, motion planners, perception tools, actuators, user interfaces, and more. Researchers value ROS for its vast library of packages, robust community support, and cross-platform portability. It enables code reuse and simplifies complex system integration—ideal for kitting out agents like the TurtleBot or Spot-inspired quadrupeds.

2. Gazebo and MORSE

Simulators are essential when physical prototyping is cost-prohibitive or dangerous. Gazebo provides realistic physics, 3D visuals, and ROS integration, allowing researchers to train perception and control algorithms before deploying them on real robots. Meanwhile, MORSE offers modular simulation with support for robotics middleware and scene composition—ideal for academic testing, multi-robot interaction, and sensor-rich environments.

Mobile Robots and Autonomous Platforms

3. TurtleBot

The TurtleBot series offers compact, mobile platforms widely used in education and research. Built on ROS, they support navigation, object recognition, and mapping tasks. Their affordability, modularity, and extensive documentation make them favored testbeds for beginners and advanced users alike.

4. NASA-JPL Open-Source Rover

Engineered by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the Open-Source Rover is a community-driven initiative designed for extraterrestrial exploration. Modeled on Mars rovers, this platform is open-hardware and software—featuring robust locomotion, power management, sensor arrays, and autonomous navigation scripts. For innovators studying planetary mobility or simply aspiring to ‘build a rover’, this project is a gold mine.

5. Husarion CORE2 and ROSbot

Husarion delivers both the CORE2 single-board computer and the ROSbot, which integrate sensor-rich towers with live ROS control. These platforms support real-time SLAM, obstacle avoidance, and AI vision experimentation. With cloud connectivity and custom firmware support, users can rapidly prototype mobile intelligence in scalable frameworks.

Quadrupeds and Legged Locomotion

6. XRobots OpenDog

A community-backed creation, XRobots’ OpenDog is a fully open-source, Arduino-based quadruped. Its aluminum chassis, servo stack, and ROS compatibility let users customize gaits, payloads, and behaviors—whether experimenting with dynamic walking, quadruped balancing, or robotic interaction.

7. NimbRo OP

With a height of around 95 cm, NimbRo OP brings humanoid robotics within easier reach. This ROS-powered, open-architecture robot features plug‑and‑play actuators, vision systems, and full kinematic control—ideal for research into human‑like movement, vision, and manipulation. Its modularity helps researchers focus on new control approaches—be it walking, object detection, or interaction.

8. Trifinger

Trifinger, developed by Google Research, is a three-finger robot enabling precise manipulation using reinforcement learning in simulated and real-world tasks. It integrates sensor feedback, high‑precision grippers, and ROS bindings—excellent for studying advanced dexterity, object repositioning, or grasp optimization.

Drone Autonomy and Aerial Platforms

9. PX4 Autopilot & ArduPilot

The future of aerial robotics lies in open‑autonomy. PX4 Autopilot and ArduPilot are major open-source autopilot software stacks supporting fixed-wing drones, multirotors, helicopters, and VTOL vehicles. With sensor fusion, waypoint navigation, and obstacle avoidance features, they are extensively used in both academia and the commercial drone sector. Their firmware, drivers, and ground control applications offer complete solutions for aerial robotics developers.

Robot Arms and Grippers

10. OpenHand (Yale GRAB Lab)

The Yale GRAB Lab’s OpenHand designs focus on affordable, tendon-driven anthropomorphic grippers. These platforms enable research in adaptive grasping, sensitive object handling, and human‑robot interaction. With open documentation and control code, they’d fit seamlessly into academic labs focusing on manipulation.

11. Takktile

Feel is fundamental to grasping—and Takktile sensors bring touch to robot palms. This open-source tactile array lets systems detect contact, force distribution, and slippage, enriching manipulation robustness. Researchers investigating tactile perception or fine motor control can apply Takktile to a wide range of arms and hands.

Educational Haptics and DIY Projects

12. Hapkit (Stanford)

The Hapkit, from Stanford’s input devices lab, is a low-cost haptic device providing force feedback via a motorized wheel. Designed for education and teleoperation prototypes, this platform helps users learn about haptics, telepresence, and motor‑human interfaces. Its open hardware and interactive examples make it ideal for workshops and teaching.

13. Bobble-Bot & Mabel

Projects like Bobble-Bot (an LED‑enabled balancing robot) and Mabel (inspired by Boston Dynamics, capable of balancing on two legs) demonstrate that accessible DIY beta testers can still innovate. They bring together IMUs, servo control, and clever mechanical designs—and both exist under open licenses on Hackaday—making them fun proof-of-concept platforms or teaching rigs.

Bio-Inspired and Animal-Inspired Robots

14. Petoi

Petoi focuses on practical, engaging robotics—like the Bittle cat-robot or Nybble cat-bot. These small quadrupeds are educational, collaborative, and easy to customize. Their Python-based firmware, ROS compatibility, and playful mechanics make them delightful tools for learning robotics while exploring biologically inspired motion.

15. Veterobot

The Veterobot project aims to improve equine and livestock care via robotic sensors or actuators—such as autonomous grooming, vital reading, or health monitoring. Though still emergent, its application of open-source sensors, autonomy, and teleoperation holds promise for scalable farm or veterinary solutions.

Reinforcement Learning & Robot Navigation

16. DeepRacer (Amazon)

AWS DeepRacer offers a compact 1/18th scale car equipped with sensors and reinforcement learning (RL) capabilities. Users train virtual agents on simulated tracks, then deploy them on physical cars for timed racing. Beyond entertainment, it’s a gateway for understanding RL, reward function tuning, and policy learning.

17. PythonRobotics

PythonRobotics, Atsushi Sakai’s open‑source collection, offers clean implementations of dozens of navigation algorithms: A*, D*, RRT, Kalman filters, SLAM, path smoothing, and more. Though not a physical robot, it’s invaluable for learning algorithmic foundations, testing sensor assumptions, and visualizing results in context. Many robotics software stacks draw from or reference it.

3D Printing, CNC and Motion Control

18. Klipper3D

Klipper3D enhances printing precision by running motion planning on a Raspberry Pi (or equivalent) and forwarding stepper commands to micro-controllers. Its use stretches to any mechatronic system requiring high-efficiency motion control—serving as a foundation for labs interested in printer-style robots, CNC arms, or pick‑and‑place machines.

Bridging Simulation and Real Hardware

19. CoppeliaSim (V-REP)

CoppeliaSim, previously known as V-REP, is a versatile simulator used in both academic and industrial contexts. It supports physics engines, ROS, rapid prototyping, and hybrid desktop-hardware environments—ideal for multi-robot coordination, complex assembly studies, or warehouse robotics.

Conclusion

The open-source robotics landscape is remarkably rich and diverse—from rovers venturing into virtual Mars environments to cat-scale quadrupeds exploring real rooms. It encompasses everything from autonomous drones to robot arms that feel objects, from tactile displays to haptic teaching tools. What unites them is a community-driven ethos: shared resources, collective troubleshooting, transparent experiments. Such openness doesn’t mean academic compromise—instead, it provides springboards for rigorous innovation, rapid prototyping, and real-world impact.

Imagine a lab where students build Takktile-equipped arms to assemble objects in a Gazebo warehouse, control them via ROS, and use PythonRobotics algorithms—all packaged in a Klipper-driven 3D‑printed chassis. Or picture interdisciplinary research combining Hapkit teleoperation with autonomous quadruped motion based on Petoi cousins. These are not fantasies—they’re made possible by the open-source projects explored here.

Whether you’re a researcher, educator, startup founder, or lifelong tinkerer, the open-source robotics movement offers unparalleled access to tools, inspiration, and knowledge. By embracing this ecosystem, you’re not just adopting code—you’re joining a community that actively advances what’s possible in robot intelligence, dexterity, autonomy, and human-robot symbiosis.

The post Top 20 open-source robotics projects and initiatives for robotics research appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

While ChatGPT has long been a go-to for many, a new generation of specialized tools is emerging—designed specifically for academic rigor, compliance, and scholarly efficiency. This article dives into five groundbreaking AI tools that are outshining ChatGPT in 2025 when it comes to research productivity and quality. We’ll move from useful to essential, culminating with the ultimate tool every serious researcher should consider integrating into their workflow.

1. Research Rabbit

One of the biggest hurdles researchers face is sifting through overwhelming volumes of literature and understanding how various studies interconnect. Research Rabbit, the fifth entry in this list, solves that exact problem with elegant simplicity.

Unlike static reference managers, Research Rabbit generates dynamic literature maps. These visual connections help you trace the evolution of a topic, spot emerging trends, and identify gaps—all at a glance. With just a click, it clusters related studies, identifies isolated works, and categorizes them by relevance, publication date, or author networks. Color-coding further enhances clarity, distinguishing between already-reviewed papers and new recommendations.

Another noteworthy integration is its compatibility with Zotero, enabling users to import folders and instantly see how their curated references relate to the broader academic landscape. It’s entirely free and extremely user-friendly—ideal for jumpstarting or refining a literature review. However, its capabilities are limited to exploration; it doesn’t assist with the actual writing process.

2. Paperpile

For researchers who often find themselves staring at a blank page, Paperpile offers a lifeline. As a Microsoft Word plugin, it embeds directly into the writing environment many academics are already familiar with, bringing intelligent writing features right where they’re needed.

Paperpile does more than generate outlines. It functions like a virtual research collaborator—offering evidence-backed suggestions, definitions, and potential citations for every section of your manuscript. Its brainstorming tool can rapidly expand underdeveloped ideas or define complex concepts with scholarly references.

Beyond ideation, Paperpile includes a proofreading engine that identifies grammatical issues, categorizes them for easier correction, and allows selective or bulk edits. It also comes with paraphrasing features, synonym suggestions, and options to make your writing more academic—all of which significantly reduce editing costs.

Another standout feature is its built-in plagiarism checker powered by Turnitin, offering peace of mind during submission preparation. Its new AI Review module goes further, proposing structural and content enhancements to improve overall readability and coherence. While not perfect, it’s already saving researchers time and money traditionally spent on professional editors.

3. Jenni

Jenni earns the bronze medal for its precision in academic writing, despite lacking direct integration with Microsoft Word. It more than compensates with its advanced outlining and content development capabilities.

What makes Jenni shine is its detailed outlines tailored to various academic formats—from standard papers to thesis chapters. While its initial output might seem generic, a quick prompt in the AI chat can transform it into a granular framework complete with subpoints and estimated word counts.

Jenni allows users to upload PDFs, ask questions about them, and extract context-aware answers for use in literature reviews. Whether you’re defining theoretical concepts or debating scholarly arguments, Jenni can flesh out ideas and even write initial drafts. The AI also assists with fluency improvement, argument balancing, and paraphrasing.

It’s free to start, with optional paid plans. Jenni stands out for researchers who need help both structuring their thoughts and generating high-quality content, making it one of the most flexible tools available in 2025.

4. Avidnote

Taking the silver medal is Avidnote, a robust research platform that goes beyond writing to support the entire research pipeline. This tool is ideal for academics managing complex projects, especially those involving both qualitative and quantitative data.

Avidnote excels in multiple domains:

• Study Planning: Generate research questions, design methodologies, and even identify suitable conferences.
• Data Analysis: Analyze both qualitative interviews and statistical data with ease.
• Document Review: Engage with uploaded PDFs via intelligent queries like “What are the limitations of this study?”
• Writing Support: Everything from structuring chapters to suggesting edits and improving clarity.

One of Avidnote’s most impressive strengths is its ability to contextualize information. You can upload multiple PDFs, pose targeted questions, and receive synthesized insights that save hours of manual reading. Additionally, it includes modules for proofreading, paraphrasing, and style adjustments—paralleling tools like Jenni and Paperpile.

However, it’s not without flaws. The interface can feel unintuitive, with essential features buried in confusing menus. Avidnote would greatly benefit from a UI overhaul to match its impressive backend intelligence.

5. SciSpace

Earning the top spot is SciSpace, a comprehensive research assistant that integrates every core function a researcher needs into a single, beautifully designed interface. Unlike its competitors, SciSpace consolidates literature review, writing, idea generation, and promotion into one cohesive experience.

Here’s what sets SciSpace apart:

• Multi-Paper Chat: Unlike most tools that allow chatting with one PDF, SciSpace enables interactive queries across multiple documents simultaneously. Whether they’re your own uploads or papers suggested by the tool, the result is a broader, more connected understanding of your topic.
• Advanced Writing Suite: SciSpace supports outline generation, drafting sections like introductions or conclusions, and refining arguments with a citation generator. The workflow is fluid, eliminating the need to switch tools.
• AI Detection & Originality Checks: SciSpace offers built-in detection of AI-generated content—a crucial feature for researchers wary of academic integrity guidelines or journal submission standards.
• Research Topic Ideation: By analyzing existing research and identifying unexplored areas, SciSpace suggests novel research topics with summarized backgrounds and potential gaps.
• Promotion Features: SciSpace even automates content promotion. By converting research papers into presentation slides and short videos formatted for social media, it helps researchers gain visibility and citations without requiring presentation design skills.

This tool strikes the perfect balance between depth and usability. While it may lack a few of the more granular options found in Avidnote, its superior user experience and functional breadth make it the standout choice in 2025.

Conclusion

The landscape of academic research is evolving, and AI is at the heart of this transformation. Gone are the days when tools like ChatGPT were the pinnacle of digital assistance. Today’s AI platforms are deeply integrated, task-specific, and researcher-centric.

Whether you’re mapping a literature review with Research Rabbit, generating content with Paperpile or Jenni, managing full research cycles with Avidnote, or streamlining everything with SciSpace, these tools are changing what it means to be productive in academia.

But remember: AI is a powerful assistant—not a replacement. The best results still come from thoughtful human oversight, critical thinking, and scholarly integrity. Embracing these tools doesn’t mean abandoning the researcher’s role—it means enhancing it.

So, choose your tools wisely and let 2025 be the year you publish smarter, faster, and better.

The post Top 5 powerful AI research tools every academic researcher should use appeared first on RoboticsBiz.

For graduate students, postdocs, or industry researchers, crafting a compelling robotics conference paper can seem daunting. This article distills a range of practical, actionable strategies for navigating this challenge. Based entirely on insights from a focused guide, we delve into what makes a paper stand out, the kinds of contributions that get recognized, and the common pitfalls to avoid. Whether you’re addressing a well-known problem or pioneering a new frontier, the principles outlined here will help elevate your writing and significantly improve your paper’s chances of acceptance.

Understanding Your Paper’s Type: Iterative Improvement vs. Novel Exploration

Before you put pen to paper, it’s essential to clarify the type of research you’re presenting. Robotics papers typically fall into two overarching categories, each with its own expectations and strategic focus.

• Refined Solutions to Established Problems: In this scenario, you’re working on a challenge that has been tackled before. Your job is to show that your solution is meaningfully better—be it through more efficient algorithms, improved performance metrics, or novel theoretical underpinnings.
• Bold New Problems or Paradigms: Here, the task or topic may not have been attempted in robotics before. The primary burden lies in demonstrating its relevance to the field and validating the soundness and utility of your approach.

Each path requires a tailored approach. If you’re refining existing work, differentiation is crucial. If you’re breaking new ground, convincing the community of your problem’s significance is key. Either way, clarity of purpose early in the writing process will help you build a stronger case for your contribution.

Context Is King: Building a Convincing Foundation

Reviewers are more likely to favor papers that situate themselves meaningfully within the broader research landscape. Knowing the background of your domain—deeply and specifically—is fundamental.

It’s not enough to say, for example, that your work contributes to “autonomous vehicles.” That’s too broad and generic. Instead, make targeted claims. Are you improving the worst-case localization accuracy in highly dynamic environments? That level of precision anchors your work in a tangible, high-impact problem.

This kind of specificity does two things:

• It demonstrates that you understand the intricacies of the domain.
• It persuades readers that your work fills a real and relevant gap.

Highlighting Contributions with Surgical Precision

A recurring weakness in many submissions is vague or inflated claims of contribution. Instead of simply stating that your system “improves localization,” consider what that improvement entails:

• Does it operate with zero training data?
• Is it deployable on ultra-low-power hardware?
• Does it leverage a novel type of sensor not previously used in this context?

The more specifically and quantitatively you can describe your contributions, the easier it is for reviewers to appreciate their value. Broad claims are easy to dismiss; detailed contributions are harder to refute.

Here’s how to sharpen your contributions:

• Use measurable metrics where possible.
• Tie your claims to real-world impact.
• Avoid overgeneralization—be exact.

Framing the Gap Without Burning Bridges

One of the essential functions of a paper’s introduction is to justify why your research needed to be done. This is often referred to as the “gap claim”—asserting that a meaningful problem remains unsolved.

There are two ways to approach this:

1. Negative framing: Emphasizing the failures of prior work.
2. Constructive framing: Acknowledging past advances while highlighting the remaining challenges.

The latter is generally preferred. It shows respect for the field and positions your work as a natural next step, not an outright rejection of what came before. Consider saying, “While significant progress has been made in X, the problem of Y remains unresolved,” rather than “Previous approaches to X are fundamentally flawed.”

Pick Your Battles: Avoiding Unnecessary Claims

Writers often fall into the trap of overreaching—making bold, speculative claims to boost the perceived importance of their work. But these can backfire if they’re not central to your argument.

For example, if your localization algorithm could be useful in autonomous vehicles, that’s valid. But do you need to argue that autonomous vehicles will dominate the globe in five years? Likely not—and that kind of claim invites unnecessary skepticism.

Focus instead on modest, defensible justifications:

• Emphasize the relevance of your work to mobile robotics broadly.
• Point to specific industry challenges or research gaps that your system addresses.

Conserve your credibility for claims that directly strengthen your paper’s core rationale.

Recognizing and Balancing the Three Pillars of Contribution

Robotics papers often stand on one or more of three foundational pillars:

1. Elegant and Novel Theoretical Insights: Proposing new models, algorithms, or frameworks.
2. Outstanding Experimental Results: Demonstrating clear, significant improvements over prior methods.
3. Demonstrably Useful Systems: Building something so innovative or practical that its value is self-evident.

Few papers excel in all three categories. The trick is to be strong in at least one—and use that strength to offset any weaknesses.

For instance:

• A paper with mind-blowing experimental results may not need the most original theory.
• A highly novel algorithm may only require basic validation on a few datasets.

The key is not to spread yourself too thin. Avoid the trap of being “just okay” across the board. Aim for excellence in at least one area, and ensure that your paper foregrounds it clearly.

Building a Rock-Solid Experimental Setup

In robotics, evaluation is often where the rubber meets the road. Strong experimental design is not just about numbers—it’s about credibility.

Here are core considerations for your experiments:

• Real-World Testing: Deploy your system on actual robots, if possible. Simulations are valuable, but real-world trials carry more weight.
• Robustness Across Conditions: Test your system on diverse datasets or scenarios. Showing that your approach generalizes boosts reviewer confidence.
• Repeatability: Make sure your results aren’t a one-off. Supplement flagship experiments with smaller secondary trials to confirm reliability.

If physical testing isn’t feasible, high-quality datasets and rigorous simulation benchmarks can still make a compelling case—provided the evaluation is thorough and well-justified.

Embracing Honesty: Acknowledging Limitations

One of the most respected—and often underused—elements of a good paper is transparency. Reviewers appreciate authors who acknowledge where their approach falls short.

Being candid about:

• Failure cases
• Scalability concerns
• Sensitivity to parameter tuning

…does not weaken your work. It enhances your trustworthiness and helps others build on your research more effectively.

Including a section on limitations signals maturity and a genuine desire to contribute to the field, rather than just market your work.

The Final Polish: Paragraph-by-Paragraph Clarity Check

Once your paper reaches a near-final draft, a highly effective technique is the “paragraph audit.” Here’s how it works:

• Go through the paper, paragraph by paragraph.
• For each one, write down a one-sentence summary of its key message.
• Ask yourself: Does this message contribute meaningfully to the story of the paper?

If a paragraph lacks a clear message or feels peripheral, consider rewriting or removing it. This method ensures narrative coherence and guards against filler content that dilutes your argument.

This polishing stage is where good papers become great. Cohesiveness and clarity make it easier for reviewers to understand—and champion—your work.

Conclusion: Writing with Purpose, Clarity, and Impact

Producing a robotics conference paper that gets accepted isn’t just about technical novelty—it’s about clarity, strategy, and a deep understanding of your audience. Every section of your paper, from the abstract to the conclusion, should be carefully crafted to communicate your contribution convincingly.

By understanding your paper’s type, framing your work within the research context, making specific and defensible claims, and delivering robust experimental validation, you increase your odds of standing out in a competitive review process.

Finally, remember: reviewers are not your adversaries. They are your first readers, tasked with recognizing valuable contributions. Make their job easier by writing with precision, humility, and purpose.

Happy paper writing—and may your next submission find its place on the program of a top-tier robotics conference.

The post How to write a winning robotics conference paper – Proven strategies and tips appeared first on RoboticsBiz.